Author Archives: deanwebb

Digging up stuff from last year…

As an artist, I sometimes have to face the fact that the conditions under which I executed a work change drastically at times. I can’t let those changed conditions take away from what I’ve done, even if it means I feel much differently about them. The work itself stands outside of time and the fact it has a changing interpretation only makes it more important in my life, in my view. My wife is in this picture, and no matter what, these are her friends.

June 2008

June 2008

This one’s a Bollywood actress and I can’t even remember which one. Nice picture, though…

Wind and Smiles

Wind and Smiles

I had forgotten I’d done these works until Shelby reminded me yesterday. Thanks to that reminder, I found a bunch of other “previously unreleased” materials. Thanks, Shelby!

Shelby

Shelby

Also in the stash of previously unreleased works…

Boudreaux

Boudreaux

Fudging Inflation

The boys that make the Consumer Price Index, or CPI, are cooking the books. We use the CPI to keep track of inflation, which is a measure of how prices are going up. If inflation’s negative, then it means prices overall are going down. Simple enough… so how do they cook the books if all they do is look at prices?

Well, they take $4500 off the price of every car in the USA because the “Cash for Clunkers” program was in effect. That’s a fudge of biblical proportions: now all the inflation-indexed payments will be slashed because if inflation goes negative, everything tied to inflation for monthly adjustments also take a walk on the negative side.

While I think deflation is on its way, this is just a way of the USG dodging its financial commitments. It has the power to do it and get away with it. It wouldn’t matter who runs the Congress or presidency: this is a bureaucratic thing, for which the only cure is stronger leadership.

The O’Jays

The O'Jays

They’re just flat-out awesome. Great harmonies, soulful sounds, strong lyrics… they know how to do it right. If you’re alive, you can always enjoy an O’Jays song one more time. Go get you some O’Jays if you don’t have any on you right now.

The Hazards of Moral Hazard

Great article in the Washington Post about moral hazard on the anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Basically, the government said it wouldn’t back up Lehman and when it didn’t, the collateral damage to the economy was so massive that the government came back, begging for forgiveness, and promise no more Lehmans.

The result? Banks could get riskier than ever. Read the article and more about what moral hazard is on the ol’ Wikipedia, and then suggest what you think the government should do. If it lets banks fail, we could have massive and deep recessions. If it doesn’t, then they’ll carry on with the bubble party because they know there’s a sugar daddy waiting to give them a bailout, no matter what.

Velocity of Money

A few years ago, we had a pretty high velocity of money. That meant, as a nation, we spent our dollars pretty rapidly. We had a lot of financial activity, and it kept our economy scooting along at top speed.

Now, we have low velocity of money. That means we’re not spending like we used to. Our demand is really low, and we’re in a recession.

The USG is going to start printing lots and lots of money. Given our current velocity of money, that will help fend off deflation… if we’re lucky. Once our velocity of money picks up again with an uptick in demand, though, we could be looking at the possibility of almost instantaneous high inflation.

Ouch and ouch, in other words.

More Bubbles?

“It will not be too bad this year. Both China and America are addressing bubbles by creating more bubbles and we’re just taking advantage of that. So we can’t lose.” – Lou Jiwei, Chairman of China’s sovereign wealth fund

Translation: Oh no, not again.

I thought we were going to deal with the damage from the housing bubble, which came about because we didn’t deal with the dotcom bubble properly. Now I read this and I guess we need to gear up for the commodity bubble that will be coming up soon. Eventually, we’re going to run out of bubbles or the ability to create bubbles and the whole thing comes crashing down that much harder.

Get ready for more Minsky Moments in the future. And if you don’t know what one is, fire up the Wikipedia and add something to this discussion when you’re familiar with the concept.

Living to 150 or More

I recently saw a news piece about longevity research. In it, a researcher bubbled that we could find ways to extend life so people would live to be 150 or even 200 by the year 2030.

Great. Just what we need when Social Security is about to go completely bust: a way to have people live longer.

We’d have a dilemma, for sure. First of all, not everyone would be able to afford treatments for age-related diseases, so we’d have rich people live on while the po’ folks keep dying as usual. Just our luck, we’ve got enough rich people in the USA so that our average lifespan would increase, just like our average GDP increases. The poor will be poor and dead as usual, while the rich will be richer and longer-lived than ever before.

And if we should have the anti-aging stuff available to one and all, then we’ll have to modify that retirement age. In a world where the average life expectancy is around 150, we’d have to set the retirement age at around 145. Beautiful. That means we all get to work for EIGHTY MORE YEARS. Ugh. No thanks.

Entry-level jobs would be that much harder to get, what with a vastly more experienced workforce. The PhD would become the new high school diploma. We’d have to stay in school until the 24th grade before going on to college. That means grade school and living with mom and dad until you’re 30. Forget about getting out of the home when you’re 18: you’ll have 12 more years to go!

And even if we finish schooling around age 40 for most folks, that still means over a century in the workforce. Even with career changes breaking up the monotony, that’s one hundred years plus doing the eight to five thing. If you take a military career and enlist when you’re 30, you’ll serve for 50 years before being eligible for retirement and a new career in the civilian workforce. You’ll still be young at 80… with 65 more productive years ahead of you…

Wanting to live is natural. I do want to live. I love my life and the people I get to meet in it. But I also look forward to when I rest my body and take up a different existence beyond this one. I really wouldn’t want to live on another 70-80 years, working most of them. That’s too much of this world.

We can medically eliminate the symptoms of aging, but there’s nothing we can do to take out the pains of regret or longing for those that died prematurely. In my scenario of primary and secondary education up to age 30, it’s entirely possible for people to have been married, divorced, and remarried by the time they graduate… or to be grandparents on the eve of their college matriculation. That’s a lot of living, with a lot more yet to come. If we eliminate barriers to longevity, will dying of a broken heart become the new leading cause of death?