Bureaucracy vs. the President

The director of the CIA recently testified to Congress that a terrorist attack was highly likely in the next 3-6 months. Coincidentally, it’s also budget time in Washington, as various departments scramble for increasing their share of federal dollars. Obama indicated he wanted to cut some spending down the road: all government bureaucracies want to avoid those cuts, so they’ll send out their respective heads to fight for their slice of the budget pie.

The CIA guy came in with the biggest splash. I’m not saying his announcement was false – and if it was, shame on him – but his announcement was timely. There was plenty of media coverage, as well. That means it’s likely the CIA prepared a media package to go with the Congressional testimony. Government agencies do that. They hand stories to the media and the media reads those stories to the cameras, often with little investigation on the part of the major media outlets, from Fox to CNN and all the major networks in between. They take the government word as gospel and pass it on to us. The pundits will howl one way or another to credit or discredit the sitting president or one of his close political cronies, but the bureaucracy itself is held sacrosanct. That suits the needs of the bureaucracy just fine.

When it comes to budget time, every bureaucracy wants a director or cabinet member that can get out and fight his president for every scrap of the budget he can grab. They don’t want someone that agrees with the president that, yes, the bureaucracy is overstaffed with middle managers and could do with a bit of a trim. There was one director of the USDA under Clinton that tried to rein in his department who soon found himself the target of an ethics query. When you fight the bureaucracy, one takes on a very powerful and resourceful opponent. It’s much easier to go native and become one of them than it is to support one’s president.

I’d expect other agencies to regard the CIA’s presentation to Congress with alarm. Not because the CIA pointed out a terrorist attack is likely to happen. Rather, because the CIA is likely to get a bigger budget at their expense. Look for more urgent meetings with Congress from other departments in the days to come as the budget fight thickens.

3 thoughts on “Bureaucracy vs. the President

  1. Uchenna Anyiam

    You know, we might not be in such bad shape right now if curruption was eliminated. It’s not like these guys don’t make TONS of money already, why can’t they just say with all honesty that no, they don’t necessarily need to drain America of all its money so they can have a little fun spending it on crap they dont’ really need… Some guy tries to do the right thing, and everyone turns against him? That’s messed up. It really is.

  2. Harrison Thomas

    Im usually all for budget cuts but won’t these lead to a loss of jobs. I mean NASA has come out and announced that they’re probably going to have to lay off some of their workers since their budget’s been sliced. And Uchay i don’t know how you can eliminate corruption, its been there since day one.

  3. Uchenna Anyiam

    I’m telling you these damn selfish politicians are screwing everyone over…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.