Category Archives: Reason to Live

Кин-Дза-Дза

Kin Dza Dza I love steampunk. Science fiction without flash and flare, but grunge and grease. Films that sweat through some incredible stories and leave you fantasizing about living in that world. One of those films is the excellent, if extremely offbeat, Russian sci-fi classics, Кин-Дза-Дза (Kin Dza Dza). The film starts here… You’ll have to see it in segments, and I strongly recommend downloading them with Tubesucker, which I use to save up YouTube clips, especially ones I really enjoy. You never know when a video’s gonna get yanked or an account suspended, so save what you can when you can.

If you liked the Jawas in Star Wars and wished the rest of the movie was more like that, this is the film for you. What I find fascinating is that hardly any of the sets were fabricated for the film. Rather, they were found among the ruins of abandoned installations in Soviet Central Asia. The characters from Earth are totally earthly in their aspects. The aliens are truly inhuman in their culture, without any Star Wars or Trek makeup to tell you they’re alien. They accomplish their otherworldliness through a dash of wardrobe, but even more so through their dialogue and actions. Of course, in their alien nature, they serve to reflect back on humanity something of what it means to be human. The ending is completely justified and satisfying. I love this film, even though I know it’s an odd beast not everyone will appreciate.

The O’Jays

The O'Jays

They’re just flat-out awesome. Great harmonies, soulful sounds, strong lyrics… they know how to do it right. If you’re alive, you can always enjoy an O’Jays song one more time. Go get you some O’Jays if you don’t have any on you right now.

Lunch Combo Number Six

Go to Mexicali at the intersection of Northwest Highway and Jupiter – it’s just west of the Lowe’s – and see where I’ve been keeping clean for the last 18 years, two years less than it’s been in business. I remember when it used to be over by the Casa Linda library and how my heart sank when it wasn’t there one day… and when my heart leapt as I discovered it had moved closer to me.

Whenever I go away for a while, I come home to Mexicali. I don’t eat there because it’s the best food in the world. I eat there because it is home, and therefore the world to which I return. No matter what fantastic things I taste abroad, I come home to lunch combo #6 and then I know I’m home. Nobody else makes the Tex-Mex like they do at Mexicali. There are plenty of great ones, sure. But nobody makes it like they do and they make it great. They’re part of the treasures around my house, part of the world I call home.

Tacos al Pastor

Tacos al Pastor

Dude. Awesome. Meat is not murder when it’s edible art like this. I have had over a dozen varieties of tacos al pastor and each blend of meat has been unique – even the same Taco Inn restaurant in Mexico City had a different flavor in the meat from day to day… always good, but always a subtle difference.

My guess is because it’s all hand-made. There’s no huge factory pumping out some name-brand carne al pastor. Instead, there’s so many cottages producing the stuff as a cottage industry that it really is being mass-produced, just without any central direction or planning. No government, no corporation… just someone who knows how to put awesome on a vertical spit and slap it between a corn tortilla with onions and cilantro when it’s ready.

I really don’t think anyone can compete with the hundreds of thousands of carne al pastor producers. Uniformity brings blandness, and carne al pastor is never, ever bland. And the tacos themselves are just a buck – or ten pesos in Mexico, which is still pretty much a buck. Forget the dollar menu at a burger joint: if you hit the taqueria, you’ll get something way more amazing than a mass-produced edible hockey puck. If you’re lucky like me and live within close range of several taquerias, the lunchtime dilemma is over which flavors to savor, not which burger to murder.

Tacos al pastor… because of them, I will seriously contemplate any offer made to move to Mexico.

Arab Labor

First of all, thank you to LinkTV for showing this series. Because AT&T U-Verse doesn’t carry LinkTV, I’m not switching from Dish satellite to U-Verse no matter how much they beg me and offer me free HBO to do so. But this is not about LinkTV right now. That’s for another column for me to write.

This one’s about Arab Labor. This is, by far, one of the best sitcoms I’ve ever seen. It’s right up there with Yes Minister, Fawlty Towers, and Seinfeld. I just ordered season one on DVD. I plan to watch it repeatedly and to find a way to use it in class.

Some people complain about having to read subtitles, but I say it’s worth the effort when something’s really really good. Arab Labor is in Hebrew and Arabic with only smatterings of Russian and English, but it’s really really good, so it’s worth reading. It takes elements from classic comedies and reworks them in original plots set in Israel. The center of the series is Amjad, an Arab journalist who’s very loyal to Israel, even though he often gets hassled for being a minority. Like Seinfeld, Arab Labor doesn’t have the characters learning big lessons or hugging each other at the end of the episodes. They carry on being who they are, flaws and all, but they all work at accommodating each other.

To a point. I mean, there’s the episode where Amjad turns over his meddling mother-in-law to the police as a suspected terrorist. Or when Amjad’s Jewish friend tries to hide the fact that he’s dating an Arab from his not-too-liberal parents. Then there’s where Amjad’s father sells the Chametz on eBay. OK, so you may have to Google up a few terms in order to get the jokes, but it’s worth it. After all, one theme in the comedy is the difficulty of coming to an understanding between cultures, so why not participate and do a little research. There’s one gag in the season finale that involves knowing the history of Zionism, but if you read up on Theodore Herzl before you watch it, you’ll hit the comedy jackpot when you hear that punchline.

Even if you’re not up on your history, you can still enjoy the sheer joy of the comic apocalypses that Amjad and his family find themselves in. Amjad’s father is my favorite character, a sort of Archie Bunker/Fred G. Sanford type of unstoppable patriarch who never lets ethics get in the way of a business deal. Amjad himself is an Arab Woody Allen, totally uncomfortable in his own skin. Amjad’s wife is his opposite: well-grounded and someone who can accept herself for who she is. She’s Amjad’s link to reality. Their daughter is not the usual precocious TV brat: she’s very well behaved, but takes after her foxy grandpa in subtly getting her way when her father goes nuts. Amjad’s Israeli friend is a schlemiel trying to do good that doesn’t care if he’s barking up the wrong tree, so long as there’s love in the branches. His on-again, off-again girlfriend is an Arab lawyer that manages to carry on a verbally violent relationship with him. Even when they’re at peace with each other, there’s never a relaxation in the tension in the relationship, which means the comedy won’t stop with that pair. If they got married, the series would not jump the shark.

Heck, the writing’s so good, they even took on another possible bad turn: the birth of a baby. In the finale, Amjad’s wife has a son. In most sitcoms, that’s the kiss of death. In Arab Labor, it’s a gateway for more comic possibilities.

Watch this show, people. It’s totally worth it.

“Ponyo” Hits a Home Run

Ponyo Went to see Ponyo today and had all my expectations met.

When I go to see a Miyazaki film, I expect nothing short of excellence. I’ve seen all his films except Howl’s Moving Castle, but I’ve ordered that just now on DVD. Although Ponyo does not share the same complex characters and situations as other Miyazaki works, it is a masterpiece, instantly accessible to children from pre-K on up to adulthood. It is the most accessible movie for little children, I think, surpassing Totoro in that category. The dividing line is simple: In Totoro, the mom is sick. In Ponyo, there’s nothing bad going on in the background. Not really. The grownups do seem to be involved in some serious matters, but those matters pale to what the children in the movie see.

What’s important to the kids in the movie is love. Nothing romantic: just a pure attachment of affection, innocent and free. I love that. As usual, Miyazaki and the rest of Studio Ghibli chose the right colors for the film. What I enjoyed especially is that instead of using his typical ligne claire style with flat colors (pardon my French, there…), he opted for more impressionistic backgrounds, adding a lovely storybook feel to the whole film.

The schools of fish and other water animals have to be considered as part of the cast of stars in the film. I loved watching them. While Pixar had a clever little aquarium and some nice fish scenes in Finding Nemo, Miyazaki’s underwater images will make me dream about living in an octopus’ garden tonight.

As I said, this is a storybook movie. The conflict is gentle; the resolution firm and joyous. The colors resound and the illustrations capture your breath and refuse to let go until the closing credits fade from view. I wept with joy as I watched the film, much as I do when I listen to Beethoven’s Pastoral symphony. Yes, the comparison to Beethoven is valid. Miyazaki is a genius and we are fortunate that he’s been given a forum to share his visions with a worldwide audience. Although the film is a beautiful storybook, it is not for everyone. I’m sorry, but it’s a sensitive film and there isn’t a crass joke anywhere in it. Kids looking for bathroom humor or crazy send-ups are not going to be happy with Ponyo. This film is for sensitive moods and open minds. For a child, it’s a wonderful, beautiful story. For an adult, there are subtleties that will pop up later on when discussing it with other adults. It is universal and it is wonderful. I don’t care if you see it: I’ve seen it and I found another reason to keep on keepin’ on today.

GDP RIP vs. Top Gear

Guy on the AP Economics list sent this link to a NYT Op-ed: GDP RIP.

I started the article and thought, “Hey, this sounds like Henry Hazlitt’s ‘Economics in One Lesson’.” Got the fallacy of the broken window right up at the front of the article. I’m right there with him in saying GDP is not going to give a complete picture and that it’s often misleading.

But I have to ask how putting prices on everything will work out…

In theory, it’s wonderful. Say we price a wetland staying a wetland as $100 million in value. A developer comes along with a project that will drain the wetland and provide maybe $75 million in value. Sorry, Mr. Developer, but that project won’t fly.

Now in practice… The developer fudges his numbers so that he projects $175 million in value and possibly gets in good with the county commissioner to revalue the swamp at $50 million in value and then gets his buddy, the local newspaper editor, to write a scathing criticism of the mosquito problem coming from that dadgum $50 million swamp. Wouldn’t everyone benefit from a nice new development there? Swamp is drained, development goes up, development doesn’t deliver as promised, but all the big dogs got their money, so who’s to say it was a bad idea? Also, thanks to cooked numbers, that National Happiness Product or whatever just went up.

So say in the case of wetlands we avoid such shenanigans by setting a straight-up dollar value per acre. Valuation’s fixed, right? No, it’s not. That developer can still fudge the boundaries of the wetland and get his reduction. Or, going the other extreme, an area could be designated as wetland but, due to changing climate, dries out and becomes hardscrabble prairie. Developer tries to build on that but is told it’s technically still a $100 million wetland because the federal government won’t redesignate it as a $2 million hardscrabble prairie.

Then there’s the good side of GDP ignoring all that activity: do we really want a set value on, say, the value of having my kids mow the lawn? Put a number on that, and it won’t take long for some genius to figure out a way to tax it. Imagine if the value of my tutoring my own kids were calculated and then I had to start taking them to a private tutor with less qualifications for a tax break… Or simply go underground and teach ’em on the sly, bootlegging education to avoid the revenuers…

I agree that GDP is a pretty poor end-all measure. But the same way we cook books to boost GDP, we’ll find a way to cook books to boost whatever we switch to. Politicians and bureaucrats are not going to suddenly change stripes. Who gets to say what’s better? If we all lived in a high-rise stacked on top of each other, within walking distance of a metro line, we’d use up a lot less gas… But we’d need a king-size sewage and water system to handle the population density. Also, if we switched from “bad” single-family homes to “good” new urban dense residential town centers, we lose a lot more greenspace per person. We also have to put up with noisy neighbors… And tinier living space. What cost, those things? Or do they get ignored by the beancounters that decided they need to weight the calculations in favor of “greener” options?

Jeremy ClarksonAnd how do we calculate “green”? The author of the article seems to push for that change… So would we all drive a Prius? By one calculation, yes we would. By Top Gear’s calculation at Google Video and YouTube, the Prius isn’t all that green. So, again, who’s to say? If we tossed GDP, what’s the guarantee that we would be getting a slightly smaller load of rubbish with the new system?

OK, so why is this also in the “Reason to Live” category? Because of Top Gear, mate! I love that show. Jeremy Clarkson is genius. Seriously, if anyone wants to buy me Top Gear on DVD, email me and we’ll work out the details. If I could teach my class with Top Gear, the world would be a better place. I don’t know what I’d call that class, but everyone would want to take it.

Here’s another Top Gear link, just for the heck of it: Listen for when Clarkson’s car makes a bad noise…

Something to Enjoy

I don’t like cursing the darkness without lighting a candle, so how about a reason to live? Let’s start with Kyle Baker’s breakout work, The Cowboy Wally Show. I’d seen it on the comic store shelves for a while and finally broke down and bought it one fine day.

Oh, the joy I had! Baker promises quality jollity on his covers, and he certainly delivered with this one.

The Cowboy Wally Show is written in a cinema verite style. Before you look at me funny for my saying I really enjoy Baker’s cinematography in this book, you have to understand it’s told as a filmed documentary for most of the book, with other parts dedicated to Wally’s television and film appearances.

The Cowboy Wally Show The book is hilarious. Baker’s drawing style is reminiscent of the golden age of Mad Magazine, with a great debt to Wally Wood, by way of George Woodbridge. He’s realistic most of the time, but always ready to exaggerate facial expressions for grand comic effect. Baker’s writing is up to the greatness of his illustration. It’s got one of my favorite lines ever: “We’re in a fort. Lock the door.” The story swings and plunges and rockets in three dimensions, taking its characters with it. OK, there are a couple of cardboard guys tossed in for running gags, but Baker definitely paints a picture of Cowboy Wally as a consummate idiot done good. The closing set, “Cowboy Wally’s Late Night Celebrity Showdown” is a perfect romp that I love to re-read.

If you’re into graphic novels, you must own this one. If you’re not yet into them, start here. There are things comics can do that simply can’t be done in any other medium. Baker’s a great artist and writer and this is a great introduction to the rest of his work. You can find it at your local comics store, which is the best place to get your comics. If you have no local comics store, then… sigh… order it from Amazon.